Saturday, January 31, 2026
Review: Iron Lung (2026)
Monday, August 4, 2025
23 Years Later...We Got "28 Years Later"
What 28 Days Later really exposed wasn’t just the horror of the infected—but the far scarier truth: what humanity becomes when we let rage and fear take control.
The success of 28 Days Later cracked the door wide open, inspiring a new wave of filmmakers to dive into the genre. It marked the rise of Edgar Wright, Simon Pegg, and Nick Frost with the genre-blending brilliance of Shaun of the Dead. We also saw a bold reimagining of Romero’s Dawn of the Dead in 2004, thanks to James Gunn and Zack Snyder. And perhaps most fittingly, Romero himself returned to continue his iconic saga with Land of the Dead.
It also inevitably paved the way for a sequel - 28 Weeks Later, released in 2007. Watching it again recently, back-to-back with the original during a double feature with my wife, I was struck by just how star-studded the cast was—something I’d completely forgotten. But almost immediately, the shift in tone was obvious.
This film had a bigger budget, no doubt about it. The increase in gore, the wider scope, and the more polished visuals made that clear. But what it gained in production value, it lost in emotional weight and thematic focus. 28 Weeks Later lacks the raw urgency and intimate terror that made 28 Days Later so unforgettable.
That’s not to say I dislike it—far from it. When viewed as a standalone entry, it’s a solid, adrenaline-fueled thriller. But it trades in the haunting questions about human nature for more conventional spectacle. The infected, for the most part, are treated more like high-speed zombies than the horrifying mirror of humanity they were in the original. The one exception is Robert Carlyle’s Don, whose arc brings back a flicker of that unsettling human darkness—but it’s not quite enough to recapture the original’s bite.
With the wave of successful requels and legacy sequels fueling audience appetite for nostalgia, Danny Boyle and Alex Garland have timed their return perfectly with 28 Years Later. Fans eager for a fresh chapter in the series have been rewarded with the original creators stepping back into the story, balancing respect for the past with new perspectives.
28 Years Later hit theaters on June 20th, 2025. Made on a $60 million budget, it went on to earn $150 million at the box office. And recently it has hit digital streaming services.
The Film
Set 28 years after the original Rage Virus outbreak, 28 Years Later follows a remote community living on the island of Lindisfarne, off England’s coast. The story focuses on 12-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams), his father Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), and his mother Isla (Jodie Comer), who is suffering from a mysterious illness marked by violent episodes and confusion. Desperate for a cure, Jamie and Spike set out for the mainland—still ravaged by the lingering effects of the Rage Virus.
As they navigate this dangerous new world, they encounter mutated infected and hostile human factions, including a cult led by Sir Jimmy Crystal (Ralph Fiennes), whose eerie resemblance to the disgraced British TV figure Jimmy Savile adds a chilling layer to the story. The film delves deep into themes of survival, resilience, and the dark undercurrents that emerge when society collapses.
This past weekend, my wife and I finally sat down to watch 28 Years Later. We’ve both been big fans of the first two films in the series—they really left a lasting impression on us. So, we were genuinely excited about this new installment. To keep the experience fresh, we avoided any trailers or spoilers and went in completely blind.
Right from the start, the opening grabbed our attention. It felt like a seamless continuation of the story from the previous two films. The film quickly established the nature of the infected and revealed what had become of key characters from the original outbreak—especially Jimmy, the young boy introduced in the opening scene. That scene packed a serious punch. I was genuinely impressed; it was both powerful and unforgettable.
After that gripping opening, we got the iconic 28 Years Later... title card—always a highlight. One thing I’ve always appreciated about these films is how they skip traditional opening credits, jumping straight into the story.
We’re quickly introduced to Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), his son Spike (Alfie Williams), and his wife Isla (Jodie Comer). Right away, they come across as relatable and grounded—an ordinary family trying to live in extraordinary circumstances. But it doesn’t take long to sense something deeper going on with Isla. She’s forgetful, distracted, and has unsettling flashes of anger. I couldn’t help but feel for them—their dynamic really pulled me in.
At this point, I wasn’t entirely sure where the story was headed. I even found myself wondering—was Aaron Taylor-Johnson’s character supposed to be the young boy from the opening? I kept waiting for some kind of reveal, some clue about what happened to young Jimmy.
It eventually became clear that this wasn’t Jamie’s story—it was Spike’s. We follow him as he journeys to the mainland with his father and embarks on his first so-called “hunt.” Looking back, it didn’t feel out of place within the series. In fact, it echoed the way the military was initially portrayed in 28 Days Later—seemingly helpful at first, only to reveal something far more sinister. That same arc applies to Jamie: what starts as a protective father figure slowly shifts into something more complex—and far more unsettling.
The first act zeroes in on Jamie and Spike’s relationship, framing the story around their father-son bond. It’s a solid foundation, and it gives us a clear sense of Jamie through Spike’s eyes—a father he admires, even idealizes, and is desperate not to disappoint. On that level, it works. The emotional beats land, and the setup is engaging enough.
But as the act wrapped up, I couldn’t help but wonder if the film was playing it too safe. It started to feel a little too familiar—like we were just watching a post-apocalyptic road movie with a family twist. I kept asking myself: is this all there is? Is the goal just to get back to Isla on the island? For a franchise that’s always pushed boundaries, this early stretch felt a bit restrained. It was effective—but it left me hoping the film had more to say than just, “get home.”
As we moved into the second act, the tone began to shift. If the first act was about Spike’s innocence—his sheltered view of the world—then the second act is where that illusion starts to break. He’s forced to confront the harsh reality of the world around him, starting with his own community.
The townspeople, once seen as survivors, begin to resemble something closer to a cult—rigid in their ways, disturbingly eager to celebrate Spike’s first kill. What should be a sobering moment is instead treated like a rite of passage, and it’s jarring.
Spike also sees his father in a new light. Jamie, once the strong and steady protector, is revealed to be far more broken and morally compromised than we—or Spike—realized. It left me questioning how many times he’s crossed lines like this before. Was this just one instance... or part of a pattern?
Then the film pivots again, sending us back to the mainland. Only now, the dynamic has changed—it’s no longer a father-son survival story, but a mother-son journey through a devastated world. The genre shifts with it, becoming a more familiar post-apocalyptic road movie. And while the emotional core remains, I started to feel the weight of the film’s structural repetition creeping in.
The second act dragged. Sure, the goal was clear—get Isla to Dr. Kelson—but the journey felt padded and slow. We got a few glimpses of the infected, but they lacked the impact or urgency of the first act.
There were a couple of memorable scenes, but not enough to keep the energy up. By this point, the film was starting to lose steam, and it showed. The tension dipped, the pacing sagged, and it felt like the story was just spinning its wheels. A new military character was introduced—then immediately reduced to comic relief and written off just as quickly. It felt like a missed opportunity and added little to the story beyond a brief tonal shift.
Then we hit the third act, where Isla and Spike stumble upon a baby—and suddenly, the film throws a dozen new questions into the mix. Was this meant to suggest an evolution in the infected? A commentary on the thin line between humanity and rage? Are we supposed to believe there’s a possibility of coexistence between the infected and the uninfected? It’s hard to say, because just as these ideas are introduced, the film barrels forward without exploring any of them.
The pacing in this final stretch is jarring. It shifts into overdrive, rushing through plot points without giving them time to breathe. One moment you’re trying to process what this baby might symbolize—and the next, the credits are rolling. It felt like the third act was in such a hurry to reach the finish line, it forgot to make the ending land.
The lead-up to the ending was a tough pill to swallow. Without giving too much away, there’s a moment that feels completely out of character and doesn’t make much sense within the story’s context. It disrupts the flow and throws the film off course in a way that’s hard to ignore.
While the intention might have been to deepen the mother-son dynamic, the execution falls flat, adding little emotional or narrative depth. For me, this misstep seriously undercut the film’s impact, to the point where I’d caution viewers about it—because it can be jarring and disappointing in a way that lingers.
When the film finally reaches its conclusion, the reveal about what happened to young Jimmy comes as a surprise—but sadly, it feels like a missed opportunity. By that point, the earlier missteps had already eroded my investment in the story. The payoff was too little, too late, leaving me emotionally distant and uninterested in where the sequel, The Bone Temple, might take things next.
The ending underscored a larger issue: the film struggled to build meaningful momentum or depth throughout, and that final reveal couldn’t repair the disconnect. Walking away, I felt a profound disappointment—not just because of what the story was, but because of what it could have been.
Rating: 1 out of 5. If you enjoy the earlier installments, I highly caution to avoid.
Ask ChatGPT
Follow BlazinBlue's Review on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.
Welcome Back To BlazinBlue's Review
Hey everyone, Matthew here from BlazinBlue's Review—how’s it going? It’s been a while since my last post—actually, nearly two years! The last one was way back in September 2023, so I figured it was time to check back in.
If you’re new here, welcome! I’m Matthew, and this is BlazinBlue’s Review (formerly BlazinBlue’s Horror Review—still working on a new logo, so hang tight). This all started from a simple love of movies. One day, I decided to take the leap and start talking about the films I loved—and to my surprise, it actually took off. Since then, I’ve had the chance to connect with some amazing people, including an early interview with David Howard Thornton (aka Art the Clown) about Terrifier 1 and 2. I've also covered some really unique and offbeat films along the way, like Weird Things and the Slumber Party Massacre remake.
Wanting to keep things exciting, I made the choice to branch out from horror and dive into a wider variety of films.
So, what’s happened since our last check-in? Quite a bit, actually. I found my way into the world of education—and I absolutely love it. On top of that, we found our forever home and started embracing the joys (and chaos) of farm life. There’s always something happening around here, and it’s never boring!
Still, something felt like it was missing. I kept thinking back to the blog—something I’m incredibly proud of. It played a big part in helping me build confidence and find my voice.
Which brings me to this—I’m ready to return. I’ve watched plenty of films since we last connected, often catching myself analyzing them more deeply than before. It just felt right to start sharing those thoughts again.
I’m not sticking to the same release schedule I had before—honestly, that was a bit too much and led to some serious burnout. This time, it’s gonna be way more laid-back. Reviews will pop up here and there whenever it feels right. No set plan, just going with the flow. And honestly? That feels pretty great. It’ll keep things fun and fresh.
So, come along for the ride as we kick off this next chapter at BlazinBlue’s Review.
Thursday, September 7, 2023
Welcome to My Nightmare: A Review of Dylan's New Nightmare
Wednesday, July 19, 2023
Tales From The U.S.S. Horizon - Episode 2: "Botanical Intrigue"
Tuesday, July 18, 2023
Tales from the U.S.S. Horizon Episode 1: "Infectious Origins"
Chief of Security, Lieutenant Commander Maxwell Phillips reporting. That's something that I still haven't gotten used to. Hard to believe that it's only been a month since I was assigned to the U.S.S. Horizon.
The U.S.S. Horizon has been sent on a critical mission in the Lysara Sector. It's a sector that not much has been known about. Uncharted territory for the Federation, if you will. I can confirm that there are five planets in this system - Lysaria, Drakalus, Xyria, Aquilon, and Zenthia. There have been rumors of feuds between two of the species, the Xyranthians and the Drakillians. The status of this sector's Federation approval is dependent on this mission.
Upon entering the sector, we received a request to dock at Harmony Station for a meeting- a space station that serves as their neutral ground between the different polities. Captain Reynolds made the decision to split the team - one's objective would be to attend the diplomatic meeting and the other's to investigate the research station.
I ask myself 'Why Starfleet deemed it necessary to send us on this mission?'. But one thing is clear - this sector's Federation approval is dependent on what transpires. To be honest, it feels like a weight has been placed on my shoulders. I don't envy Captain Reynold's responsibilities. But I must stay focused.
Security's Log, supplemental:
The meeting didn't go according to plan. The positive is that we made contact with the different polities: the Lysarians, the Drakallians, the Nalorians, the Xyranthians, and the Zenithians. It's clear that the Lysarians are the peacekeepers as the tensions between the Drakallians and the Xyranthians was very evident. We learned that Korvex Prime had been colonized recently by the Xyranthians. While the Xyranthians viewed this as a sign of their species strength and adaptability, others viewed it as a sign of power and force. Ambassador Valeer of the Lysarians was quick to remind Captain Vosran (of the Drakallians) and Commander Nalos (of the Xyranthians) of what the Lysara Sector was attempting to accomplish - proving to the Federation that they were ready to join them.
Captain Reynolds attempted to reach the away team down on the surface to no response…
To Be Continued...
If this interested you, check out Captain's Log over at Modiphius.
Monday, July 17, 2023
Star Trek Adventures: Captain's Log
Thursday, June 8, 2023
Review: SCREAM VI (2023)
Hello everyone, BlazinBlue's Review has returned once again with a new review. This is one that I know some have been waiting for. It's time to talk about Scream VI (or Scream 6).
When Scream '22 (Scream 5 or 5cream as the internet had decided to call it) released, it was very nostalgic. It was like coming home to a warm blanket that had just been taken out of the dryer. Cozy. It was an interesting re-quel. It was familiar. The first part was very much in the vein of the original film. But then when Dewey's Last Stand happens, the film hit differently. It showed and expressed that it wasn't afraid to not pull some punches. I know for me, I kept hoping that Dewey was going to come out the film on his feet. But then that scene, it knocked the wind out of me. And I wasn't sure what was going to happen next. I didn't know if any of the legacy characters were exactly safe. And that third act is still pretty great.
With Scream VI, I went to see it for my birthday. It's one of those times where the movie gods seemed to shine down as everything had lined up. I went into the theater with a large Root Beer and a medium popcorn. It's honestly something that I don't do very often anymore. Ever since the pandemic, theaters have kind of changed. But there was still that small little spark of being able to escape from the worlds problems and get lost in the story.
After that initial watch, I left the theater floored. I didn't know what I had just watched. Well at the very least, I knew it was a Scream film. But it wasn't what I had expected. I guess I was expecting something more in the vein of Scream '22. But Scream VI is far from in the vein of Scream '22. I knew it was going to be very difficult to try to express my thoughts. And it was going to take time and a few times of rewatching it to fully get it. It honestly put my brain on the back burner with movie reviews for a little bit. First time I had found myself a bit flabbergasted like this.
When first had heard that Scream VI was moving to New York, I was really intrigued. It's always interesting to see the filmmakers take Ghostface and move the story out of Woodsboro. As much as I love Woodsboro, there's only so many times we can have these things happen there. So seeing our survivors of Scream '22 in New York was pretty welcoming. Then there was mention of them being in college. Cool. It firmly established that Radio Silence was gunning for a Scream 2 to their Scream '22.
Then, something interesting happened. They completely subverted expectations. That's honestly one of the best things that Scream VI does, to an extent. It subverted expectations. The kids are going to be in college? Nah, it'll be there for a moment. But just don't let yourself get attached to the idea of seeing them in college. It's going to be set around Halloween? Sweet, nice throwback to Halloween '78 in a way. But don't expect anything too far out of a sequence here and there. Though, if one keeps a keen eye out, there are some small little glimpses that it's Halloween time. Do wish that there would have been more with it though.
The opening was something that definitely caught me off guard. It firmly establishes that this won't be the same type of film that Scream '22 was. Yes, we get Samara Weaving in a fun little homage to Drew Barrymore. She's a fish out of water in the big city trying to meet people. It's our first little play of the idea with the college trope as she's a professor. But then that final slash happens leaving us with Ghostface standing there and staring at what they'd done. At that point, we usually would have had our title credit. But it keeps lingering and then unmasking, were we going to get our first audience known Ghostface? I was very intrigued by this concept. Then the rest of the opening played out.
On a recent rewatch, the opening hit very different this go around. It felt a bit Hitchcockian. Think about it, the first part of Psycho establishes that we were going to be following Marion Crane then twists it with that shower scene. This opening played very similar to me.
The rest of that first act then is fast and loose with re-establishing characters and establishing the newer ones. One of the new characters that I found myself really liking is Danny Brackett, Sam's new love interest. He just felt like a really solid good guy. He understands where Sam's at with everything and wants to be there to help. He never felt like a red herring to me. Then there's "I had econ!" Ethan, Chad's quiet roommate. Ethan never left much of an impression unfortunately. I'm guessing that he may had left that in Econ as well. Quinn, Sam and Tara's roommate, was interesting as she was the embracing her wild side in a sense trope. Then there's Annika, Mindy's love interest. She sadly didn't leave much of an impression either, on me or the ladder scene. Oh, is it too soon? And then we have Detective Bailey. During that initial watch, I felt it too easy for him to be involved. In a sense, it still is but now knowing how the story plays out, it feels a little more natural now. Especially as he quickly lays out the cards in one scene, "You mess with my family. You pay.".
I know that there have been quite a lot of people talking about the story. There are some gaps in logic and may be one or two small spots that feel misplaced. But for the most part, it plays things fast and loose. It hits the ground running and just doesn't look back. It's meant to be a fun thrill ride. It also hit me that the previous Scream films are firmly love letters to the Slasher genre. This film is a love letter to Giallo. It's very much evident with how the film plays against the audience's expectations. Radio Silence had a lot of fun with subverting expectations. This is also the first Scream film to have a lot of set pieces: (the Bodega, the Ladder, the Train, and the Shrine). Each one of these sequences are pretty damn memorable. I know, I'm leaving out Gale's sequence and the opening. While Gale's sequence is pretty great, to me it never felt like they could pull the trigger on killing her off. They were pulling their punch after killing off Dewey in the previous film. It'll be interesting to see if they bring her back and how this experience had effected her.
In this recent rewatch, the film didn't feel scary during that first act. It felt fun and lacking suspense. But then that apartment and ladder scene arrives, and the film switches gears amazingly. The tension and terror arrives in full force. There are two shots in that sequence where Ghostface felt so different to how he'd been shown in the film so far. The stabbing of the knife into the window sill before grabbing the ladder and the last look before walking away. Both of them are pretty incredible. With that first trailer, I honestly was shocked that they had decided to show part of the train sequence. I mean it makes sense as it firmly established we would see Ghostface in New York. But when the scene arrived, I was shocked cause for the most part it didn't play out like it had been shown. There was a lot more tension to it as we find our group separated. It may be one of my favorite, if not my favorite sequence, in the film.
The idea of the Shrine was one that I was all geared up for. It felt different than anything before. In one way, it's very operatic in its approach. It's bold and grandiose. It showcases so many easter eggs so naturally. It's very much a visual representation of the Scream franchise. I originally didn't know how it was going to be used. I just knew it was cool cause it gave us a lair in a sense. Upon rewatches, it's pretty cool discovering more of the easter eggs that originally missed. But by the end of the sequence, it kinda tears down what came before to establish something new. Something fresh. And shows that wherever the story takes us next, it'll be different.
When they revealed who was behind everything, I wasn't as surprised about at least one of the killers. But with the rewatch, it's very clear that wasn't the point. This sequence was more about the motive than anything else. I'd say that it's a great sister counterpart to Scream 2's reveal. It also further builds on Richie's backstory. Though one thing that's pretty interesting is how Bailey and Ethan's performances are. They both had some Stu-isms with how gleeful they were. It immediately reminded me of Matthew Lillard's performane at the end of the original, "I always had a thing for ya Sid!".
Scream VI definitely got better for me with some rewatches and time to think on it. It continued to be entertaining each time. Yeah, there may be a moment here and there that wish we'd get more time. More time with Gale. More time with some of these newer characters. But it plays lean and mean with the time it has. It further establishes the Core Four as well. And I anticipate that Scream 7 will further build on the character of Danny Brackett. This is a film that definitely felt like a reinvention of the films that makes it new and fresh. And I honestly look forward to seeing where they go next.
Rating: 4 out of 5.
Follow BlazinBlue's Review on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.
Wednesday, May 10, 2023
Review: EVIL DEAD RISE (2023)
Review: Iron Lung (2026)
Iron Lung marks an impressive milestone in Markiplier’s journey—his feature film debut after three long years of anticipation. O...
-
Welcome Back to BlazinBlue's Review! I hope everyone's been doing well. Last time, I started testing the waters with expanding t...
-
Iron Lung marks an impressive milestone in Markiplier’s journey—his feature film debut after three long years of anticipation. O...
-
The zombie genre first clawed its way onto the screen in 1968 with George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead , and it’s refused to stay bur...








